There's a post from the Chronicle of Higher Education's ProfHacker blog that showcases one graduate student's cost saving portable scanning station, which he assembled for far less than than a commercial workstation. When working with primary materials the student is able to image all of the documents and save them for his personal use. The only hitch is that not all archives allow cameras to be used, or in some cases, archives ban tripods or fixtures to hold cameras. Roy Tennant writes about the blog post, but it seems that his main point is to promote an OCLC report.
Is this something that libraries should be examining, or is it more geared toward researches on a tight budget whom travel? It seems those who would benefit the most are researchers who need to be mobile. Turning to libraries, it would make the most sense for small libraries or historical societies. It's amazing how fast users can image books and manuscripts with a large imaging station that uses dual cameras connected to a computer. However, a setup like that can cost $10,000 and require support. For libraries that have felt unable to digitize due to startup costs, it may be time to reevaluate.
