Freely available in PMC may not be enough?
True open access (including availability to computer manipulation of text, etc.) has value that has only begun to be explored by various science communities. In some cases it may be worth it to pay the money for OPEN CHOICE publishing or to choose journals that publish with Creative Commons/Science Commons reuse policies. The more I learn about copyright, the more questions I have and the more annoyed I am with the U.S. copyright law. This month, among all the discussion of the NIH Public Policy implementation date, I keep seeing discussions about this topic also:
- No data- or text-mining at PMC
- Open access is not just a free pdf, which refers to an editorial in PLoS Computational Biology Open Access: Taking Full Advantage of the Content
- Open Access and using molecular structures in education
- Open Access Week - Green is not enough - from Peter Murray Rust's blog which often talks about Open Science issues; updated by A better interpretation of green and gold
- and the conversation continues Strong and Weak OA - weak open access (OA) is relatively common, removing price barriers to access; strong OA removes permission barriers, such as, unnecessary copyright and licensing restrictions.
